Voters Want Less Pork, Even in Their Own District

Club President Pat Toomey had an op-ed in this morning's Wall Street Journal about a nationwide poll that we did on earmarks. Excerpt:

If you want to know how out of touch Congress is on the issue of wasteful spending, listen to Florida Rep. John Mica defend his pork projects: "There's no way in hell I would support banning earmarks. That's our job, getting elected and making decisions." Mr. Mica is the most powerful Republican on the Transportation Committee.

The idea that bringing home federal dollars is integral to a politician's job and essential to getting re-elected is a favorite of Republicans and Democrats alike. Three months ago, Hillary Clinton told the Pittsburgh Tribune Review, "I'm very proud of my earmarks. It's one of the reasons I won 67% of the vote, because I took care of my people." Alaska Republican Rep. Don Young, a professional earmarker, sees a direct correlation between earmarks and political longevity. "I listen and I provide. That's what I'm elected for. You show me a congressman who says, I'm not going to have any earmarks, and I'm not going to listen, and I'm not going to provide, and I'll show you a short-timer."

There is just one problem with this theory. It is dead wrong.

Click here to learn why.


Posted by Andrew Roth on July 24, 2008 8:10 AM
(Source URL: http://www.clubforgrowth.org/2008/07/voters_want_less_pork_even_in.php)