
Topic: Elections
102 Democratic House Seats Now Highly Vulnerable
Posted on Nov. 01, 10 | 04:57 PM by David Keating | Topic: Elections
Charlie Cook today updated his race ratings in 16 House races, meaning I have another update for the Top 150 House Democratic seats most at risk.
The biggest news is that the number of highly vulnerable seats goes up by two! For the first time ever in my tracking, there are now 102 Democratic seats that can be classified as highly vulnerable, meaning no better than "lean Democratic."
In 14 of the 16 rating changes, the races went toward Republicans. He put four more Democrats in toss-up status and put two others back in the safe column. That means my four prognosticators now show 120 Democratic House seats in play, still an amazing number, but down two from last week. (In play means that at least one of the four of the prognosticators rates the race as other than solidly Democratic.)
Here are the current estimates by category:
* 59 seats are very slightly to safely Republican (unchanged from Friday).
* 21 are toss ups (up 2).
* 22 are leaning Democratic (unchanged).
To provide more detail, 32 (up two from Friday) seats are lean to solidly Republican. Another 27 are toss-up/tilt Republican (down 2). 20 are pure toss-up (up 4). Only 1 is toss-up/tilt Democrat (down 2).
Another 18 seats (down 4) are rated likely Democratic by at least one of the four, and in 7 cases two or more of the prognosticators.
I think the Democratic losses will be historic. The only question in my mind is how far back you have to go to find a larger loss of seats. I think you will have to go back to 1938, 1922 or 1894, depending on the size of the losses.
There was more news today from the Gallup poll:
Gallup also reports that "the Republicans could gain anywhere from 60 [House] seats on up, with gains well beyond that possible."
Finally, Gallup said this gap is "unprecedented in Gallup polling and could result in the largest Republican margin in House voting in several generations. This means that seat projections have moved into uncharted territory, in which past relationships between the national two-party vote and the number of seats won may not be maintained."
There is a chance, a very real chance, that the polling this year could be wrong, even this Gallup finding. It could underestimate, or overestimate, the possible result.
In fact, Nate Silver, a respected analyst says his model projects that "the spread of potential outcomes is exceptionally wide: its 95 percent confidence interval runs from a 23-seat Republican gain to an 81-seat one."
Silver notes another "X" factor that could push the results to 81 seats or more. "There could also be a group of Republican-leaning voters who are cast aside by these [polling] models: specifically, those who identify themselves with the Tea Party...[or] folks who are dissatisfied with 'politics as usual' and may until recently have been disengaged from electoral politics entirely."
I look at my list and I would bet the odds are a lot higher the losses for Democrats will be 80+ than for them to lose just 23 seats.
Below is the list of the 150 Democratic seats most likely to switch.
Methodology:
I'm tracking four prognosticators who rate House races who I think do the best job -- Cook, Rothenberg, Sabato and CQ. My list of the Democratic seats most likely to switch is based on the most aggressive prognosticator in assessing the race in favor of the Republican. I have marked down Sabato to toss-up/tilt R if he is the only one at lean Republican. That's because Sabato forces his final picks out of the toss-up category, so to make his estimates comparable to the other three, I make that adjustment.
In the event of a tie between races, the prognosticator average breaks the tie and if the ranking is still tied, my computer rating of the voting behavior of the seat breaks that tie. Seats not considered in play by the four prognosticators are ranked based on my computer ranking of the seat's voting behavior and quality of the Republican nominee's campaign.
This analysis does NOT predict how many seats will flip to Republican. It just lists those that are at least somewhat competitive. It is likely that only a relative few of the seats listed after ranking #102 will flip to Republican. Don't expect more than at most a handful, if any, of the races labeled long shots to come in.
This list also does not include Republican seats in play. There are three that are likely to flip or leaning to the Democrats -- DE-AL (Castle, open), LA-2 (Cao), and IL-10 (Kirk, open).
Permalink: http://www.clubforgrowth.org/perm/?postID=14387
Member Comments (2)
The biggest news is that the number of highly vulnerable seats goes up by two! For the first time ever in my tracking, there are now 102 Democratic seats that can be classified as highly vulnerable, meaning no better than "lean Democratic."
In 14 of the 16 rating changes, the races went toward Republicans. He put four more Democrats in toss-up status and put two others back in the safe column. That means my four prognosticators now show 120 Democratic House seats in play, still an amazing number, but down two from last week. (In play means that at least one of the four of the prognosticators rates the race as other than solidly Democratic.)
Here are the current estimates by category:
* 59 seats are very slightly to safely Republican (unchanged from Friday).
* 21 are toss ups (up 2).
* 22 are leaning Democratic (unchanged).
To provide more detail, 32 (up two from Friday) seats are lean to solidly Republican. Another 27 are toss-up/tilt Republican (down 2). 20 are pure toss-up (up 4). Only 1 is toss-up/tilt Democrat (down 2).
Another 18 seats (down 4) are rated likely Democratic by at least one of the four, and in 7 cases two or more of the prognosticators.
I think the Democratic losses will be historic. The only question in my mind is how far back you have to go to find a larger loss of seats. I think you will have to go back to 1938, 1922 or 1894, depending on the size of the losses.
There was more news today from the Gallup poll:
Gallup's analysis of several indicators of voter turnout from the weekend poll suggests turnout will be slightly higher than in recent years, at 45%. This would give the Republicans a 55% to 40% lead on the generic ballot, with 5% undecided.
Gallup also reports that "the Republicans could gain anywhere from 60 [House] seats on up, with gains well beyond that possible."
Finally, Gallup said this gap is "unprecedented in Gallup polling and could result in the largest Republican margin in House voting in several generations. This means that seat projections have moved into uncharted territory, in which past relationships between the national two-party vote and the number of seats won may not be maintained."
There is a chance, a very real chance, that the polling this year could be wrong, even this Gallup finding. It could underestimate, or overestimate, the possible result.
In fact, Nate Silver, a respected analyst says his model projects that "the spread of potential outcomes is exceptionally wide: its 95 percent confidence interval runs from a 23-seat Republican gain to an 81-seat one."
Silver notes another "X" factor that could push the results to 81 seats or more. "There could also be a group of Republican-leaning voters who are cast aside by these [polling] models: specifically, those who identify themselves with the Tea Party...[or] folks who are dissatisfied with 'politics as usual' and may until recently have been disengaged from electoral politics entirely."
I look at my list and I would bet the odds are a lot higher the losses for Democrats will be 80+ than for them to lose just 23 seats.
Below is the list of the 150 Democratic seats most likely to switch.
Methodology:
I'm tracking four prognosticators who rate House races who I think do the best job -- Cook, Rothenberg, Sabato and CQ. My list of the Democratic seats most likely to switch is based on the most aggressive prognosticator in assessing the race in favor of the Republican. I have marked down Sabato to toss-up/tilt R if he is the only one at lean Republican. That's because Sabato forces his final picks out of the toss-up category, so to make his estimates comparable to the other three, I make that adjustment.
In the event of a tie between races, the prognosticator average breaks the tie and if the ranking is still tied, my computer rating of the voting behavior of the seat breaks that tie. Seats not considered in play by the four prognosticators are ranked based on my computer ranking of the seat's voting behavior and quality of the Republican nominee's campaign.
This analysis does NOT predict how many seats will flip to Republican. It just lists those that are at least somewhat competitive. It is likely that only a relative few of the seats listed after ranking #102 will flip to Republican. Don't expect more than at most a handful, if any, of the races labeled long shots to come in.
This list also does not include Republican seats in play. There are three that are likely to flip or leaning to the Democrats -- DE-AL (Castle, open), LA-2 (Cao), and IL-10 (Kirk, open).
| Rank | 2010 Incumbent | District | Nominee | Rating |
| 1 | Melancon | LA3 | Jeff Landry | Safe R |
| 2 | Gordon | TN6 | Dianne Black | Safe R |
| 3 | Ellsworth | IN8 | Larry Bucshon | Likely R |
| 4 | Tanner | TN8 | Stephen Fincher | Likely R |
| 5 | Snyder | AR2 | Tim Griffin | Likely R |
| 6 | Moore, D. | KS3 | Kevin Yoder | Likely R |
| 7 | Kilroy | OH15 | Steve Stivers | Likely R |
| 8 | Markey | CO4 | Cory Gardner | Likely R |
| 9 | Grayson | FL8 | Dan Webster | Likely R |
| 10 | Halvorson | IL11 | Adam Kinzinger | Likely R |
| 11 | Dahlkemper | PA3 | Mike Kelly | Likely R |
| 12 | Edwards, C. | TX17 | Bill Flores | Likely R |
| 13 | Massa | NY29 | Tom Reed | Likely R |
| 14 | Kosmas | FL24 | Sandy Adams | Likely R |
| 15 | Boyd | FL2 | Steve Southerland | Likely R |
| 16 | Shea-Porter | NH1 | Frank Guinta | Likely R |
| 17 | Kratovil | MD1 | Andy Harris | Lean R |
| 18 | Driehaus | OH1 | Steve Chabot | Lean R |
| 19 | Kagen | WI8 | Reid Ribble | Lean R |
| 20 | Teague | NM2 | Steve Pearce | Lean R |
| 21 | Marshall | GA8 | Austin Scott | Lean R |
| 22 | Kirkpatrick | AZ1 | Paul Gosar | Lean R |
| 23 | Nye | VA2 | Scott Rigell | Lean R |
| 24 | Berry | AR1 | Rick Crawford | Lean R |
| 25 | Titus | NV3 | Joe Heck | Lean R |
| 26 | Perriello | VA5 | Robert Hurt | Lean R |
| 27 | Stupak | MI1 | Dan Benishek | Lean R |
| 28 | Baird | WA3 | Jaime Herrera | Lean R |
| 29 | Hodes | NH2 | Charlie Bass | Lean R |
| 30 | Sestak | PA7 | Pat Meehan | Lean R |
| 31 | Spratt | SC5 | Mick Mulvaney | Lean R |
| 32 | Boccieri | OH16 | Jim Renacci | Lean R |
| 33 | Davis, L. | TN4 | Scott DesJarlais | Toss Up/Tilt R |
| 34 | Pomeroy | ND1 | Richard Berg | Toss Up/Tilt R |
| 35 | Herseth Sandlin | SD1 | Kristi Noem | Toss Up/Tilt R |
| 36 | Foster | IL14 | Randy Hultgren | Toss Up/Tilt R |
| 37 | Salazar | CO3 | Scott Tipton | Toss Up/Tilt R |
| 38 | Hall, J. | NY19 | Nan Hayworth | Toss Up/Tilt R |
| 39 | Mitchell | AZ5 | David Schweikert | Toss Up/Tilt R |
| 40 | Kanjorski | PA11 | Lou Barletta | Toss Up/Tilt R |
| 41 | Murphy | NY20 | Chris Gibson | Toss Up/Tilt R |
| 42 | Murphy, P. | PA8 | Michael Fitzpatrick | Toss Up/Tilt R |
| 43 | Obey | WI7 | Sean Duffy | Toss Up/Tilt R |
| 44 | Hill | IN9 | Todd Young | Toss Up/Tilt R |
| 45 | Carney | PA10 | Thomas Marino | Toss Up/Tilt R |
| 46 | Mollohan | WV1 | David McKinley | Toss Up/Tilt R |
| 47 | Schauer | MI7 | Tim Walberg | Toss Up/Tilt R |
| 48 | Minnick | ID1 | Raul Labrador | Toss Up/Tilt R |
| 49 | Childers | MS1 | Alan Nunnelee | Toss Up/Tilt R |
| 50 | Adler | NJ3 | Jon Runyan | Toss Up/Tilt R |
| 51 | Hare | IL17 | Bobby Schilling | Toss Up/Tilt R |
| 52 | Space | OH18 | Bob Gibbs | Toss Up/Tilt R |
| 53 | McNerney | CA11 | David Harmer | Toss Up/Tilt R |
| 54 | Kissell | NC8 | Harold Johnson | Toss Up/Tilt R |
| 55 | Rodriguez, C. | TX23 | Quico Canseco | Toss Up/Tilt R |
| 56 | Klein | FL22 | Allen West | Toss Up/Tilt R |
| 57 | Bishop, S. | GA2 | Mike Keown | Toss Up/Tilt R |
| 58 | Bright | AL2 | Martha Roby | Toss Up/Tilt R |
| 59 | Owens | NY23 | Matt Doheny | Toss Up/Tilt R |
| 60 | Taylor | MS4 | Steven Palazzo | Toss Up |
| 61 | Arcuri | NY24 | Richard Hanna | Toss Up |
| 62 | Heinrich | NM1 | Johnathan L. Barela | Toss Up |
| 63 | Schrader | OR5 | Scott Bruun | Toss Up |
| 64 | Delahunt | MA10 | Jeff Perry | Toss Up |
| 65 | Skelton | MO4 | Vicky Hartzler | Toss Up |
| 66 | Giffords | AZ8 | Jesse Kelly | Toss Up |
| 67 | Boucher | VA9 | Morgan Griffith | Toss Up |
| 68 | Donnelly | IN2 | Jackie Walorski Swihart | Toss Up |
| 69 | Connolly | VA11 | Keith Fimian | Toss Up |
| 70 | Wilson, C. | OH6 | Bill Johnson | Toss Up |
| 71 | Bishop | NY1 | Randy Altschuler | Toss Up |
| 72 | Critz | PA12 | Tim Burns | Toss Up |
| 73 | Costa | CA20 | Andy Vidak | Toss Up |
| 74 | Larsen | WA2 | John Koster | Toss Up |
| 75 | Grijalva | AZ7 | Ruth McClung | Toss Up |
| 76 | Chandler | KY6 | Andy Barr | Toss Up |
| 77 | McIntyre | NC7 | Ilario Pantano | Toss Up |
| 78 | Oberstar | MN8 | Chip Cravaack | Toss Up |
| 79 | Pingree | ME1 | Dean Scontras | Toss Up |
| 80 | Etheridge | NC2 | Renee Ellmers | Toss Up/Tilt D |
| 81 | Peters | MI9 | Rocky Raczkowski | Lean D |
| 82 | Walz | MN1 | Randy Demmer | Lean D |
| 83 | Sanchez, Loretta | CA47 | Van Tran | Lean D |
| 84 | Boswell | IA3 | Brad Zaun | Lean D |
| 85 | Kind | WI3 | Dan Kapanke | Lean D |
| 86 | Loebsack | IA2 | Marianette Miller-Meeks | Lean D |
| 87 | Kennedy, P. | RI1 | John Loughlin | Lean D |
| 88 | Himes | CT4 | Dan Debicella | Lean D |
| 89 | Shuler | NC11 | Jeff Miller | Lean D |
| 90 | McMahon | NY13 | Michael Grimm | Lean D |
| 91 | Altmire | PA4 | Keith Rothfus | Lean D |
| 92 | Maffei | NY25 | Ann Marie Buerkle | Lean D |
| 93 | Murphy, C. | CT5 | Sam Caliguri | Lean D |
| 94 | Sutton | OH13 | Tom Ganley | Lean D |
| 95 | Perlmutter | CO7 | Ryan Frazier | Lean D |
| 96 | Braley | IA1 | Benjamin Lange | Lean D |
| 97 | Carnahan | MO3 | Ed Martin | Lean D |
| 98 | Ortiz | TX27 | Blake Farenthold | Lean D |
| 99 | Hinchey | NY22 | George Phillips | Lean D |
| 100 | Frank | MA4 | Sean Bielat | Lean D |
| 101 | Matheson | UT2 | Morgan Philpot | Lean D |
| 102 | Michaud | ME2 | Jason Levesque | Lean D |
| 103 | Holden | PA17 | Dave Argall | Likely D |
| 104 | Yarmuth | KY3 | Todd Lally | Likely D |
| 105 | Rahall | WV3 | Elliot "Spike" Maynard | Likely D |
| 106 | Bean | IL8 | Joe Walsh | Likely D |
| 107 | Cardoza | CA18 | Michael Berryhill | Likely D |
| 108 | Holt | NJ12 | Scott Sipprelle | Likely D |
| 109 | Wu | OR1 | Rob Cornilles | Likely D |
| 110 | Ross | AR4 | Beth Anne Rankin | Likely D |
| 111 | DeFazio | OR4 | Art Robinson | Likely D |
| 112 | Tierney | MA6 | Bill Hudak | Likely D |
| 113 | Cooper | TN5 | David Hall | Likely D |
| 114 | Lujan | NM3 | Thomas E. Mullins | Likely D |
| 115 | Kucinich | OH10 | Peter Corrigan | Likely D |
| 116 | Smith, Adam | WA9 | Dick Muri | Likely D |
| 117 | Tsongas | MA5 | Jon Golnik | Likely D |
| 118 | Barrow | GA12 | Ray McKinney | Likely D |
| 119 | McCarthy, C. | NY4 | Fran Becker | Likely D |
| 120 | Pallone Jr. | NJ6 | Anna Little | Likely D |
| 121 | Dicks | WA6 | Doug Cloud | Long Shot |
| 122 | Peterson | MN7 | Lee Byberg | Long Shot |
| 123 | Boren | OK2 | Charles Thompson | Long Shot |
| 124 | Cuellar | TX28 | Bryan Underwood | Long Shot |
| 125 | Miller, B. | NC13 | Bill Randall | Long Shot |
| 126 | Dingell | MI15 | Rob Steele | Long Shot |
| 127 | Price, D. | NC4 | William "BJ" Lawson | Long Shot |
| 128 | Doggett | TX25 | Donna Campbell | Long Shot |
| 129 | Courtney | CT2 | Janet Peckinpaugh | Long Shot |
| 130 | Filner | CA51 | Nick Popaditch | Long Shot |
| 131 | Kaptur | OH9 | Rich Lott | Long Shot |
| 132 | Weiner | NY9 | Bob Turner | Long Shot |
| 133 | Capps | CA23 | Tom Watson | Long Shot |
| 134 | Thompson, B. | MS2 | Bill Marcy | Long Shot |
| 135 | Schwartz | PA13 | Carson Dee Adcock | Long Shot |
| 136 | Polis | CO2 | Stephen Bailey | Long Shot |
| 137 | Cleaver | MO5 | Jacob Turk | Long Shot |
| 138 | Hinojosa | TX15 | Eddie Zamora | Long Shot |
| 139 | Inslee | WA1 | James Watkins | Long Shot |
| 140 | Israel | NY2 | John Gomez | Long Shot |
| 141 | Castor | FL11 | Mike Prendergast | Long Shot |
| 142 | Costello | IL12 | Teri Davis Newman | Long Shot |
| 143 | Carson | IN7 | Marvin Scott | Long Shot |
| 144 | Richardson | CA37 | Star Parker | Long Shot |
| 145 | Schakowsky | IL9 | Joel Pollak | Long Shot |
| 146 | Kildee | MI5 | John Kupiec | Long Shot |
| 147 | Tonko | NY21 | Theodore Danz | Long Shot |
| 148 | Higgins | NY27 | Lenny Roberto | Long Shot |
| 149 | Gonzalez | TX20 | Clayton Trotter | Long Shot |
| 150 | Sarbanes | MD3 | Jim Wilhelm | Long Shot |
Member Comments (2)
100 Democratic Seats Now Highly Vulnerable
Posted on Oct. 29, 10 | 04:04 PM by David Keating | Topic: Elections
Here is what I think may be the last update of the Top 150 House Democratic seats most at risk.
Three of the the four prognosticators I'm following issued updates since yesterday and this incorporates the slew of new race ratings.
For the first time ever in my tracking, there are now 100 Democratic seats that can be classified as highly vulnerable.
To recap the rating changes: Sabato moved 38 races toward Republicans and only four against them. Sabato dumps the toss-up category in his final assessment, as he always does.
Rothenberg moved 34 seats toward Republicans, and just one against them.
Cook moved 12 races toward Republicans, and just three against them.
Overall, there are now 122 Democratic seats as in play, meaning that at least one of the four of the prognosticators rates the race as other than solidly Democratic.
I had to change my methodology somewhat due to Sabato's call of each race to one party or another. His calls would distort comparisons, as others use the toss-up category. So if he is the only one to rate a race as lean Republican, I put that in my rating as toss-up/tilt Republican. There already was such a category, but I force Sabato's picks in there too if he is the only one saying lean.
So with that caveat, here are the calls (note that the numbers are not directly comparable to the previous update due to the change in methodology):
* 59 seats are very slightly to safely Republican (up 20).
* 19 are toss ups (down 15).
* 22 are leaning Democratic (down 3).
To provide more detail, 30 seats are lean to solidly Republican. Another 29 are toss-up/tilt Republican. 16 are pure toss-up. Only 3 are toss-up/tilt Democrat.
Another 22 seats are rated likely Democratic by at least one of the four, and in 7 cases two or more of the prognosticators.
I get the feeling that Sabato and Rothenberg think the losses will be far more than they are projecting, but can't bring themselves to say so. Cook has 22 seats in the Republican column and an astonishing 49 as toss-ups. Yet he still hedges, saying that "Republicans win more than half of the Toss Ups and a handful of the 27 races in the Lean Democratic column, GOP gains would approach 60 seats."
I think if there is a wave, a lot more than half the toss-ups will flip, which is why I think this list below is a good picture of where things appear to stand.
I think the Democratic losses will be historic. The only question in my mind is how far back you have to go to find a larger loss of seats. I think you will have to go back to 1938, 1922 or 1894, depending on the size of the losses.
Below is the list of the 150 Democratic seats most likely to switch.
Methodology:
I'm tracking four prognosticators who rate House races who I think do the best job -- Cook, Rothenberg, Sabato and CQ. My list of the Democratic seats most likely to switch is based on the most aggressive prognosticator in assessing the race in favor of the Republican. I have marked down Sabato to toss-up/tilt R if he is the only one at lean Republican.
In the event of a tie between races, the prognosticator average breaks the tie and if the ranking is still tied, my computer rating of the voting behavior of the seat breaks that tie. Seats not considered in play by the four prognosticators are ranked based on my computer ranking of the seat's voting behavior and quality of the Republican nominee's campaign.
This analysis does NOT predict how many seats will flip to Republican. It just lists those that are at least somewhat competitive. It is likely that only a relative few of the seats listed after ranking #100 will flip to Republican. Don't expect more than at most a handful, if any, of the races labeled long shots to come in.
This list also does not include Republican seats in play. There are two that are likely to flip to the Democrats -- DE-AL (Castle) and LA-2 (Cao).
Permalink: http://www.clubforgrowth.org/perm/?postID=14376
Member Comments (2)
Three of the the four prognosticators I'm following issued updates since yesterday and this incorporates the slew of new race ratings.
For the first time ever in my tracking, there are now 100 Democratic seats that can be classified as highly vulnerable.
To recap the rating changes: Sabato moved 38 races toward Republicans and only four against them. Sabato dumps the toss-up category in his final assessment, as he always does.
Rothenberg moved 34 seats toward Republicans, and just one against them.
Cook moved 12 races toward Republicans, and just three against them.
Overall, there are now 122 Democratic seats as in play, meaning that at least one of the four of the prognosticators rates the race as other than solidly Democratic.
I had to change my methodology somewhat due to Sabato's call of each race to one party or another. His calls would distort comparisons, as others use the toss-up category. So if he is the only one to rate a race as lean Republican, I put that in my rating as toss-up/tilt Republican. There already was such a category, but I force Sabato's picks in there too if he is the only one saying lean.
So with that caveat, here are the calls (note that the numbers are not directly comparable to the previous update due to the change in methodology):
* 59 seats are very slightly to safely Republican (up 20).
* 19 are toss ups (down 15).
* 22 are leaning Democratic (down 3).
To provide more detail, 30 seats are lean to solidly Republican. Another 29 are toss-up/tilt Republican. 16 are pure toss-up. Only 3 are toss-up/tilt Democrat.
Another 22 seats are rated likely Democratic by at least one of the four, and in 7 cases two or more of the prognosticators.
I get the feeling that Sabato and Rothenberg think the losses will be far more than they are projecting, but can't bring themselves to say so. Cook has 22 seats in the Republican column and an astonishing 49 as toss-ups. Yet he still hedges, saying that "Republicans win more than half of the Toss Ups and a handful of the 27 races in the Lean Democratic column, GOP gains would approach 60 seats."
I think if there is a wave, a lot more than half the toss-ups will flip, which is why I think this list below is a good picture of where things appear to stand.
I think the Democratic losses will be historic. The only question in my mind is how far back you have to go to find a larger loss of seats. I think you will have to go back to 1938, 1922 or 1894, depending on the size of the losses.
Below is the list of the 150 Democratic seats most likely to switch.
Methodology:
I'm tracking four prognosticators who rate House races who I think do the best job -- Cook, Rothenberg, Sabato and CQ. My list of the Democratic seats most likely to switch is based on the most aggressive prognosticator in assessing the race in favor of the Republican. I have marked down Sabato to toss-up/tilt R if he is the only one at lean Republican.
In the event of a tie between races, the prognosticator average breaks the tie and if the ranking is still tied, my computer rating of the voting behavior of the seat breaks that tie. Seats not considered in play by the four prognosticators are ranked based on my computer ranking of the seat's voting behavior and quality of the Republican nominee's campaign.
This analysis does NOT predict how many seats will flip to Republican. It just lists those that are at least somewhat competitive. It is likely that only a relative few of the seats listed after ranking #100 will flip to Republican. Don't expect more than at most a handful, if any, of the races labeled long shots to come in.
This list also does not include Republican seats in play. There are two that are likely to flip to the Democrats -- DE-AL (Castle) and LA-2 (Cao).
| Rank | 2010 Incumbent | District | Nominee | Rating |
| 1 | Melancon | LA3 | Jeff Landry | Safe R |
| 2 | Gordon | TN6 | Dianne Black | Safe R |
| 3 | Ellsworth | IN8 | Larry Bucshon | Likely R |
| 4 | Tanner | TN8 | Stephen Fincher | Likely R |
| 5 | Snyder | AR2 | Tim Griffin | Likely R |
| 6 | Moore, D. | KS3 | Kevin Yoder | Likely R |
| 7 | Kilroy | OH15 | Steve Stivers | Likely R |
| 8 | Markey | CO4 | Cory Gardner | Likely R |
| 9 | Halvorson | IL11 | Adam Kinzinger | Likely R |
| 10 | Dahlkemper | PA3 | Mike Kelly | Likely R |
| 11 | Edwards, C. | TX17 | Bill Flores | Likely R |
| 12 | Massa | NY29 | Tom Reed | Likely R |
| 13 | Grayson | FL8 | Dan Webster | Likely R |
| 14 | Kosmas | FL24 | Sandy Adams | Likely R |
| 15 | Boyd | FL2 | Steve Southerland | Likely R |
| 16 | Shea-Porter | NH1 | Frank Guinta | Likely R |
| 17 | Driehaus | OH1 | Steve Chabot | Lean R |
| 18 | Kagen | WI8 | Reid Ribble | Lean R |
| 19 | Kratovil | MD1 | Andy Harris | Lean R |
| 20 | Marshall | GA8 | Austin Scott | Lean R |
| 21 | Kirkpatrick | AZ1 | Paul Gosar | Lean R |
| 22 | Nye | VA2 | Scott Rigell | Lean R |
| 23 | Perriello | VA5 | Robert Hurt | Lean R |
| 24 | Stupak | MI1 | Dan Benishek | Lean R |
| 25 | Baird | WA3 | Jaime Herrera | Lean R |
| 26 | Hodes | NH2 | Charlie Bass | Lean R |
| 27 | Sestak | PA7 | Pat Meehan | Lean R |
| 28 | Teague | NM2 | Steve Pearce | Lean R |
| 29 | Spratt | SC5 | Mick Mulvaney | Lean R |
| 30 | Boccieri | OH16 | Jim Renacci | Lean R |
| 31 | Davis, L. | TN4 | Scott DesJarlais | Toss Up/Tilt R |
| 32 | Berry | AR1 | Rick Crawford | Toss Up/Tilt R |
| 33 | Pomeroy | ND1 | Richard Berg | Toss Up/Tilt R |
| 34 | Titus | NV3 | Joe Heck | Toss Up/Tilt R |
| 35 | Herseth Sandlin | SD1 | Kristi Noem | Toss Up/Tilt R |
| 36 | Foster | IL14 | Randy Hultgren | Toss Up/Tilt R |
| 37 | Salazar | CO3 | Scott Tipton | Toss Up/Tilt R |
| 38 | Hall, J. | NY19 | Nan Hayworth | Toss Up/Tilt R |
| 39 | Mitchell | AZ5 | David Schweikert | Toss Up/Tilt R |
| 40 | Kanjorski | PA11 | Lou Barletta | Toss Up/Tilt R |
| 41 | Murphy | NY20 | Chris Gibson | Toss Up/Tilt R |
| 42 | Murphy, P. | PA8 | Michael Fitzpatrick | Toss Up/Tilt R |
| 43 | Obey | WI7 | Sean Duffy | Toss Up/Tilt R |
| 44 | Hill | IN9 | Todd Young | Toss Up/Tilt R |
| 45 | Carney | PA10 | Thomas Marino | Toss Up/Tilt R |
| 46 | Mollohan | WV1 | David McKinley | Toss Up/Tilt R |
| 47 | Schauer | MI7 | Tim Walberg | Toss Up/Tilt R |
| 48 | Minnick | ID1 | Raul Labrador | Toss Up/Tilt R |
| 49 | Childers | MS1 | Alan Nunnelee | Toss Up/Tilt R |
| 50 | Adler | NJ3 | Jon Runyan | Toss Up/Tilt R |
| 51 | Hare | IL17 | Bobby Schilling | Toss Up/Tilt R |
| 52 | Space | OH18 | Bob Gibbs | Toss Up/Tilt R |
| 53 | McNerney | CA11 | David Harmer | Toss Up/Tilt R |
| 54 | Kissell | NC8 | Harold Johnson | Toss Up/Tilt R |
| 55 | Rodriguez, C. | TX23 | Quico Canseco | Toss Up/Tilt R |
| 56 | Klein | FL22 | Allen West | Toss Up/Tilt R |
| 57 | Bishop, S. | GA2 | Mike Keown | Toss Up/Tilt R |
| 58 | Bright | AL2 | Martha Roby | Toss Up/Tilt R |
| 59 | Owens | NY23 | Matt Doheny | Toss Up/Tilt R |
| 60 | Taylor | MS4 | Steven Palazzo | Toss Up |
| 61 | Arcuri | NY24 | Richard Hanna | Toss Up |
| 62 | Heinrich | NM1 | Johnathan L. Barela | Toss Up |
| 63 | Schrader | OR5 | Scott Bruun | Toss Up |
| 64 | Delahunt | MA10 | Jeff Perry | Toss Up |
| 65 | Skelton | MO4 | Vicky Hartzler | Toss Up |
| 66 | Giffords | AZ8 | Jesse Kelly | Toss Up |
| 67 | Donnelly | IN2 | Jackie Walorski Swihart | Toss Up |
| 68 | Connolly | VA11 | Keith Fimian | Toss Up |
| 69 | Wilson, C. | OH6 | Bill Johnson | Toss Up |
| 70 | Bishop | NY1 | Randy Altschuler | Toss Up |
| 71 | Critz | PA12 | Tim Burns | Toss Up |
| 72 | Costa | CA20 | Andy Vidak | Toss Up |
| 73 | Larsen | WA2 | John Koster | Toss Up |
| 74 | Grijalva | AZ7 | Ruth McClung | Toss Up |
| 75 | Chandler | KY6 | Andy Barr | Toss Up |
| 76 | Boucher | VA9 | Morgan Griffith | Toss Up/Tilt D |
| 77 | McIntyre | NC7 | Ilario Pantano | Toss Up/Tilt D |
| 78 | Etheridge | NC2 | Renee Ellmers | Toss Up/Tilt D |
| 79 | Peters | MI9 | Rocky Raczkowski | Lean D |
| 80 | Walz | MN1 | Randy Demmer | Lean D |
| 81 | Sanchez, Loretta | CA47 | Van Tran | Lean D |
| 82 | Boswell | IA3 | Brad Zaun | Lean D |
| 83 | Kind | WI3 | Dan Kapanke | Lean D |
| 84 | Loebsack | IA2 | Marianette Miller-Meeks | Lean D |
| 85 | Kennedy, P. | RI1 | John Loughlin | Lean D |
| 86 | Himes | CT4 | Dan Debicella | Lean D |
| 87 | Shuler | NC11 | Jeff Miller | Lean D |
| 88 | McMahon | NY13 | Michael Grimm | Lean D |
| 89 | Altmire | PA4 | Keith Rothfus | Lean D |
| 90 | Maffei | NY25 | Ann Marie Buerkle | Lean D |
| 91 | Murphy, C. | CT5 | Sam Caliguri | Lean D |
| 92 | Sutton | OH13 | Tom Ganley | Lean D |
| 93 | Perlmutter | CO7 | Ryan Frazier | Lean D |
| 94 | Braley | IA1 | Benjamin Lange | Lean D |
| 95 | Oberstar | MN8 | Chip Cravaack | Lean D |
| 96 | Carnahan | MO3 | Ed Martin | Lean D |
| 97 | Ortiz | TX27 | Blake Farenthold | Lean D |
| 98 | Pingree | ME1 | Dean Scontras | Lean D |
| 99 | Hinchey | NY22 | George Phillips | Lean D |
| 100 | Frank | MA4 | Sean Bielat | Lean D |
| 101 | Holden | PA17 | Dave Argall | Likely D |
| 102 | Yarmuth | KY3 | Todd Lally | Likely D |
| 103 | Rahall | WV3 | Elliot "Spike" Maynard | Likely D |
| 104 | Bean | IL8 | Joe Walsh | Likely D |
| 105 | Cardoza | CA18 | Michael Berryhill | Likely D |
| 106 | Holt | NJ12 | Scott Sipprelle | Likely D |
| 107 | Wu | OR1 | Rob Cornilles | Likely D |
| 108 | Matheson | UT2 | Morgan Philpot | Likely D |
| 109 | Ross | AR4 | Beth Anne Rankin | Likely D |
| 110 | DeFazio | OR4 | Art Robinson | Likely D |
| 111 | Tierney | MA6 | Bill Hudak | Likely D |
| 112 | Cooper | TN5 | David Hall | Likely D |
| 113 | Lujan | NM3 | Thomas E. Mullins | Likely D |
| 114 | Doggett | TX25 | Donna Campbell | Likely D |
| 115 | Kucinich | OH10 | Peter Corrigan | Likely D |
| 116 | Michaud | ME2 | Jason Levesque | Likely D |
| 117 | Smith, Adam | WA9 | Dick Muri | Likely D |
| 118 | Price, D. | NC4 | William "BJ" Lawson | Likely D |
| 119 | Tsongas | MA5 | Jon Golnik | Likely D |
| 120 | Barrow | GA12 | Ray McKinney | Likely D |
| 121 | McCarthy, C. | NY4 | Fran Becker | Likely D |
| 122 | Pallone Jr. | NJ6 | Anna Little | Likely D |
| 123 | Dicks | WA6 | Doug Cloud | Long Shot |
| 124 | Peterson | MN7 | Lee Byberg | Long Shot |
| 125 | Boren | OK2 | Charles Thompson | Long Shot |
| 126 | Cuellar | TX28 | Bryan Underwood | Long Shot |
| 127 | Courtney | CT2 | Janet Peckinpaugh | Long Shot |
| 128 | Miller, B. | NC13 | Bill Randall | Long Shot |
| 129 | Dingell | MI15 | Rob Steele | Long Shot |
| 130 | Filner | CA51 | Nick Popaditch | Long Shot |
| 131 | Kaptur | OH9 | Rich Lott | Long Shot |
| 132 | Capps | CA23 | Tom Watson | Long Shot |
| 133 | Weiner | NY9 | Bob Turner | Long Shot |
| 134 | Schwartz | PA13 | Carson Dee Adcock | Long Shot |
| 135 | Polis | CO2 | Stephen Bailey | Long Shot |
| 136 | Hinojosa | TX15 | Eddie Zamora | Long Shot |
| 137 | Israel | NY2 | John Gomez | Long Shot |
| 138 | Inslee | WA1 | James Watkins | Long Shot |
| 139 | Castor | FL11 | Mike Prendergast | Long Shot |
| 140 | Costello | IL12 | Teri Davis Newman | Long Shot |
| 141 | Hoyer | MD5 | Charles Lollar | Long Shot |
| 142 | Kildee | MI5 | John Kupiec | Long Shot |
| 143 | Sarbanes | MD3 | Jim Wilhelm | Long Shot |
| 144 | Tonko | NY21 | Theodore Danz | Long Shot |
| 145 | Carson | IN7 | Marvin Scott | Long Shot |
| 146 | Ruppersberger | MD2 | Marcelo Cardarelli | Long Shot |
| 147 | Green, G. | TX29 | Roy Morales | Long Shot |
| 148 | Gonzalez | TX20 | Clayton Trotter | Long Shot |
| 149 | DeGette | CO1 | Mike Fallon | Long Shot |
| 150 | Richardson | CA37 | Star Parker | Long Shot |
Member Comments (2)
More Prognosticator Movement to Republicans UPDATED
Posted on Oct. 29, 10 | 11:32 AM by David Keating | Topic: Elections
Larry Sabato and Stewart Rothenberg updated their House ratings yesterday.
Sabato moved 38 races toward Republicans and only four against them. Now, Sabato does things differently, which is that he calls races for one party or the other in his final assessment. He dumps the toss-up category. Still, the ratio is stunning. His call?
A gain of 55 seats for Republicans.
Rothenberg moved 34 seats toward Republicans, and just one against them. His call?
"Likely Republican gain of 55-65 seats, with gains at or above 70 seats possible."
National Journal polled its insiders, both Democrats and Republicans. Democrats predicted 47 seats for Republicans and the Republicans estimated 53.
I was part of the National Journal poll. My guess was 72.
As I write this, Charlie Cook just published a new stream of race updates. I don't know how many, but judging from the size of my unread mail, it's a lot. And it's still coming in.
UPDATE:
"The Cook Political Report's pre-election House outlook is a Democratic net loss of 48 to 60 seats, with higher losses possible."
These guys are soundling like weather forecasters before a big winter storm. 6-12 inches, but it may be 24 inches.
Permalink: http://www.clubforgrowth.org/perm/?postID=14372
Member Comments (0) Add a Comment
Sabato moved 38 races toward Republicans and only four against them. Now, Sabato does things differently, which is that he calls races for one party or the other in his final assessment. He dumps the toss-up category. Still, the ratio is stunning. His call?
A gain of 55 seats for Republicans.
Rothenberg moved 34 seats toward Republicans, and just one against them. His call?
"Likely Republican gain of 55-65 seats, with gains at or above 70 seats possible."
National Journal polled its insiders, both Democrats and Republicans. Democrats predicted 47 seats for Republicans and the Republicans estimated 53.
I was part of the National Journal poll. My guess was 72.
As I write this, Charlie Cook just published a new stream of race updates. I don't know how many, but judging from the size of my unread mail, it's a lot. And it's still coming in.
UPDATE:
"The Cook Political Report's pre-election House outlook is a Democratic net loss of 48 to 60 seats, with higher losses possible."
These guys are soundling like weather forecasters before a big winter storm. 6-12 inches, but it may be 24 inches.
Permalink: http://www.clubforgrowth.org/perm/?postID=14372
Member Comments (0) Add a Comment
Club for Growth Action Launches Radio Ad in CA-11
Posted on Oct. 29, 10 | 10:08 AM by Michael Connolly | Topic: Elections
WASHINGTON – Club for Growth Action today announced a radio advertising buy in California’s 11th congressional district race between incumbent Democrat Rep. Jerry McNerney and pro-growth conservative challenger David Harmer.
“While the Giants and Rangers decide the World Series next week, 11th district voters will be deciding what kind of economy they want to pass on to their children,” said Club President Chris Chocola. “Incumbent Congressman Jerry McNerney has had his way for four years now, and the results are higher debt, bigger government, and millions of lost jobs.”
The ad, titled “Baseball,” will air via a substantial radio buy across the 11th district between now and election day.
###
Member Comments (0) Add a Comment
“While the Giants and Rangers decide the World Series next week, 11th district voters will be deciding what kind of economy they want to pass on to their children,” said Club President Chris Chocola. “Incumbent Congressman Jerry McNerney has had his way for four years now, and the results are higher debt, bigger government, and millions of lost jobs.”
The ad, titled “Baseball,” will air via a substantial radio buy across the 11th district between now and election day.
###
PAID FOR BY CLUB FOR GROWTH ACTION AND NOT AUTHORIZED BY ANY CANDIDATE OR CANDIDATE'S COMMITTEE. 202-955-5500.
We're sorry, your browser does not support this audio player.
Click here to download the audio file the file (MP3).
Permalink: http://www.clubforgrowth.org/perm/?postID=14371
Member Comments (0) Add a Comment
Washingtonians Rebel Against Income Tax
Posted on Oct. 29, 10 | 09:21 AM by Andrew Roth | Topic: Elections
From a SurveyUSA poll in the state of Washington:
Member Comments (0) Add a Comment
On initiative 1098, which would create a state income tax on individual filers earning more than $200,000 and on couples earning more than $400,000, as well as reduce state property taxes, reduce certain business and occupation taxes, and direct any increased revenues to education and health, are you ... Certain to vote yes? Certain to vote no? Or not certain?
Yes 34%
No 56%
Not Certain 10%
Permalink: http://www.clubforgrowth.org/perm/?postID=14368
Yes 34%
No 56%
Not Certain 10%
Member Comments (0) Add a Comment
100 Write-In Candidates in Alaska
Posted on Oct. 29, 10 | 09:11 AM by Andrew Roth | Topic: Elections
This is outstanding. From the POLITICO:
Member Comments (3)
Just hours before the final deadline, more than 100 Alaskans came out Thursday to file as write-in candidates in an effort to thwart Sen. Lisa Murkowski's bid to retain her Senate seat.
At the urging of a local talk radio host, scores of people signed up to be write-in candidates with the Alaska Division of Elections before registration closed.
The move by the new Senate hopefuls was prompted by a recent decision by the Alaska Supreme Court paving the way for election officials to hand out lists of write-in candidates at polling locations. Another hearing is scheduled for Friday morning to address the matter.
PAID FOR BY CLUB FOR GROWTH PAC AND NOT AUTHORIZED BY ANY CANDIDATE OR CANDIDATE'S COMMITTEE. 202-955-5500.
Permalink: http://www.clubforgrowth.org/perm/?postID=14367Member Comments (3)
Throw the Bums Out!
Posted on Oct. 28, 10 | 11:52 AM by Andrew Roth | Topic: Elections
From Rasmussen Reports:
Member Comments (3)
A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 65% of Likely U.S. Voters say if they had the option next week, they would vote to get rid of the entire Congress and start all over again. Only 20% would opt to keep the entire Congress instead. Fifteen percent (15%) aren’t sure.
Permalink: http://www.clubforgrowth.org/perm/?postID=14361
Member Comments (3)
CFG Election Night Scoreboard
Posted on Oct. 28, 10 | 11:02 AM by Andrew Roth | Topic: Elections
Next Tuesday, we're going to launch our Election Night Scoreboard. You'll be able to track how Club PAC-endorsed candidates are doing in their races and you'll also be able to chat with the Club's staff and other Club members.
You can access the Scoreboard now (we're still making edits), but the bells and whistles won't light up until 6pm EDT on Tuesday. We hope you can join us.
Permalink: http://www.clubforgrowth.org/perm/?postID=14360
Member Comments (4)
You can access the Scoreboard now (we're still making edits), but the bells and whistles won't light up until 6pm EDT on Tuesday. We hope you can join us.
Permalink: http://www.clubforgrowth.org/perm/?postID=14360
Member Comments (4)
Club for Growth PAC Launches Television Ad in AZ-05
Posted on Oct. 27, 10 | 04:16 PM by Michael Connolly | Topic: Elections
WASHINGTON – Club for Growth PAC today released a television ad in Arizona’s 5th congressional district race between incumbent Democrat Rep. Harry Mitchell and pro-growth challenger David Schweikert.
“For four years, we’ve tried it Harry Mitchell’s way, and the devastating results are all around us,” said Club President Chris Chocola. “It’s time for new ideas and new leaders, and David Schweikert’s pro-growth, limited-government vision for our economy is exactly what we need today.”
The 30-second spot, titled “Enough,” will air on cable television throughout the 5th district through election day.
###
Member Comments (0) Add a Comment
“For four years, we’ve tried it Harry Mitchell’s way, and the devastating results are all around us,” said Club President Chris Chocola. “It’s time for new ideas and new leaders, and David Schweikert’s pro-growth, limited-government vision for our economy is exactly what we need today.”
The 30-second spot, titled “Enough,” will air on cable television throughout the 5th district through election day.
###
PAID FOR BY CLUB FOR GROWTH PAC AND NOT AUTHORIZED BY ANY CANDIDATE OR CANDIDATE'S COMMITTEE. 202-955-5500.
Permalink: http://www.clubforgrowth.org/perm/?postID=14356Member Comments (0) Add a Comment
Club for Growth Action Puts $400K More Into Colorado Senate Race
Posted on Oct. 27, 10 | 04:07 PM by Michael Connolly | Topic: Elections
WASHINGTON – Club for Growth Action today announced an additional $400,000 ad buy in the Colorado Senate race, supporting pro-growth conservative challenger Ken Buck and exposing the liberal voting record of incumbent liberal Sen. Michael Bennet.
“Senator Michael Bennet has been in Washington for two years, but he votes and acts like he’s been there forever,” said Club President Chris Chocola. “The choice facing voters in Colorado is a choice between the failed big-government agenda of Michael Bennet and the proven job-creating, economic freedom agenda of Ken Buck.”
The 30-second spot, titled “Enough,” will appear on broadcast and cable television throughout the state until election day.
###
Member Comments (2)
“Senator Michael Bennet has been in Washington for two years, but he votes and acts like he’s been there forever,” said Club President Chris Chocola. “The choice facing voters in Colorado is a choice between the failed big-government agenda of Michael Bennet and the proven job-creating, economic freedom agenda of Ken Buck.”
The 30-second spot, titled “Enough,” will appear on broadcast and cable television throughout the state until election day.
###
PAID FOR BY CLUB FOR GROWTH ACTION AND NOT AUTHORIZED BY ANY CANDIDATE OR CANDIDATE'S COMMITTEE. 202-955-5500.
Permalink: http://www.clubforgrowth.org/perm/?postID=14355Member Comments (2)
Pence May Leave Leadership in 2011
Posted on Oct. 27, 10 | 08:23 AM by Andrew Roth | Topic: Elections
This was fully expected. Pence has always had higher aspirations. From the POLITICO:
Member Comments (4)
House Republican Conference Chairman Mike Pence (Ind.) is considering stepping down from his post in the GOP leadership in preparation for a possible bid for president or governor in 2012.
Pence, a darling of the conservative movement, would leave the leadership job with a blunt explanation to colleagues that he can’t commit to a two-year term in House leadership, a source familiar with his deliberations told POLITICO Tuesday.
Pence believes it would be inappropriate to stay at the GOP conference post – the no. 3 spot in the House Republican hierarchy – unless he could stay through 2012, the source said. Pence also believes that he can be a more effective conservative voice if he is free of the responsibilities that he would have in leadership of a House Republican majority.
Permalink: http://www.clubforgrowth.org/perm/?postID=14349
Member Comments (4)
