Blog  //   TV  //   Press Releases  //   Dumb Laws  //   Member-Generated Links
Club for Growth Blog

Topic: Taxes

Club for Growth Op-Ed: "Death Tax is Unfair"

Posted on Dec. 16, 10 | 11:34 AM by Andrew Roth | Topic: Taxes
Club for Growth President Chris Chocola had this op-ed in today's USA Today.  Here it is in full:

Opposing view on inheritances: 'Death tax' is unfair

By Chris Chocola

There are two questions about resurrecting the 'death tax': the economic question and the moral question.

The economic question is simple: Does the estate tax help create jobs, grow the economy or improve our country. In every case, the answer is no.

First of all, it is unfair to retax money that has already been taxed, at least once, as income, capital gains or dividends. Washington already got its cut when the money was earned or invested. Congress has no outstanding claim on what is left over.

Nor does the estate tax generate all that much revenue. By the standards of President Obama's Washington, the $21 billion the death tax brought in the last year it was in effect is practically a rounding error.

Nor does it help the economy.

Let's say an entrepreneur's business is worth $15 million. Under the proposed estate tax in the bipartisan deal, the day he dies, the businessman's kids would owe Uncle Sam $3.5 million. If they don't have that kind of cash lying around — and no small businessmen do — they have to sell the family business to pay the taxes. The company that buys the business sells off its assets and lets the employees go. A successful business disappears, and experienced employers no longer create jobs. In fact, hundreds of people lose their jobs. All so Congress can increase revenue by a thousandth of a percent? I don't think so.

The economic argument holds up even if the heir to a vast fortune is a total embarrassment. Even if he never gets a real job and wastes his life away buying sports cars, comic books and expensive booze, the money he pumps into his local economy — via the car dealerships, book shops and liquor stores — will create more jobs than anything Congress would do with it.

Which brings us to the moral argument, which is what this is really all about. Does the money you earn over the course of your life belong to you, or does it really belong to the government, which generously allows you to keep some of it for a while?

On this policy, as so many others, if we want the right answer, we have to ask the right question.

Permalink: http://www.clubforgrowth.org/perm/?postID=14596
Member Comments (6)

We're Number One!

Posted on Dec. 16, 10 | 09:13 AM by Andrew Roth | Topic: Taxes
We're #1, but not in a good way.  The United States now has the highest corporate income tax rate in the developed world after Japan recently announced that it has decided to lower their rate by 5%.  Chris Edwards at the Cato Institute has the ugly details.
Permalink: http://www.clubforgrowth.org/perm/?postID=14593
Member Comments (0) Add a Comment

Rush Limbaugh: "I Hope This Deal Fails"

Posted on Dec. 10, 10 | 03:41 PM by Andrew Roth | Topic: Taxes
 
Permalink: http://www.clubforgrowth.org/perm/?postID=14582
Member Comments (6)

Senator-Elect Pat Toomey on the Tax Deal

Posted on Dec. 10, 10 | 03:22 PM by Andrew Roth | Topic: Taxes
 
Permalink: http://www.clubforgrowth.org/perm/?postID=14581
Member Comments (5)

Chocola Talks About Tax Compromise with Neil Cavuto

Posted on Dec. 10, 10 | 08:54 AM by Andrew Roth | Topic: Taxes
 
Permalink: http://www.clubforgrowth.org/perm/?postID=14577
Member Comments (4)

A Crap Sandwich for the Left

Posted on Dec. 08, 10 | 03:46 PM by Michael Connolly | Topic: Taxes
A lot of reporters seem to be wondering why liberals opposed to the tax cut bargain are enraged while conservatives are upset, but not furious.  The answer is not that it's a much better deal for the Right.  Nor is it that conservatives "are better at supressing dissent," as David Axelrod "joked".

The simple answer is that conservatives opposed to the plan are free to fight it, on principle (as the Club is doing).  Conservatives may have been disappointed by, say, Medicare Part D or Harriet Miers, but they weren't furious about it.  They assessed the situation, decided it was unacceptable, and went about trying to stop it, irrespective of the president's party.  Same as now.

The thing about the hard left here, the reason they're so angry, is that they really have no choice but to take it.  They know that if they bring the compromise down, the Democrats are in a worse position on the tax issue next year, that Obama has already demonstrated he's not choosing to fight this fight.  They realize they have no leverage over him, his eyes now squarely focused on re-election. 

The president essentially served principled ideologues on both sides a proverbial "crap sandwich," but unlike principled conservatives, principeld liberals actually have to eat it.
Permalink: http://www.clubforgrowth.org/perm/?postID=14570
Member Comments (2)

Club for Growth on Tax Compromise: “No Deal”

Posted on Dec. 07, 10 | 03:13 PM by Michael Connolly | Topic: Taxes
WASHINGTON – The Club for Growth today declared its opposition to the tax compromise proposal reached yesterday by President Obama and congressional Republicans.

“This is bad policy, bad politics, and a bad deal for the American people,” said Club President Chris Chocola.  “The plan would resurrect the Death Tax, grow government, blow a hole in the deficit with unpaid-for spending, and do so without providing the permanent relief and security our economy needs to finally start hiring and growing again.”

“Instead, Congress should pass a permanent extension of current rates, including a permanent repeal of the death tax, and drop all new spending,” Chocola said.  “A month ago, the American people repudiated Washington big government.  It’s time for both parties to finally hear that message and act on it.”

###
Permalink: http://www.clubforgrowth.org/perm/?postID=14565
Member Comments (2)

Two Interesting House Votes

Posted on Dec. 03, 10 | 09:06 AM by Andrew Roth | Topic: Taxes
House Democrats brought up a bill yesterday to extend all of the Bush tax cuts for the middle-class while letting the higher-end tax cuts expire.  In effect, it would be a huge tax hike on Jan. 1 for a lot of people, including small business owners.  The bill passed 234-188, with 3 Republicans voting YES with the Democrats - Walter Jones (NC-03), Ron Paul (TX-14), and John Duncan (TN-02).  Twenty Democrats voted NO, a lot of whom won't be coming back next year thanks to the results handed out on that Tuesday in early November.

Fortunately, since the bill can't pass the Senate, Democrats will be forced to go back to the negotiation table with Republicans and ultimately relent on extending all of the tax cuts.

The House also voted yesterday to censure Charlie Rangel for his tax-related improprieties.  The resolution passed 333-79.  Two Republicans voted NO - Peter King (NY-03) and Don Young (AK-AL).
Permalink: http://www.clubforgrowth.org/perm/?postID=14550
Member Comments (4)

Rep. Yarmuth: Small Business Can Handle a Tax Hike

Posted on Dec. 02, 10 | 04:27 PM by Andrew Roth | Topic: Taxes
 
Permalink: http://www.clubforgrowth.org/perm/?postID=14549
Member Comments (2)

Should the White House and the GOP Compromise on the Tax Cut Extension?

Posted on Dec. 01, 10 | 08:54 AM by Andrew Roth | Topic: Taxes
That's the question that The Hill newspaper posed yesterday.  Here is my response.  Unfortunately, I don't think Senator Kyl and Rep. Camp are going to listen.
Permalink: http://www.clubforgrowth.org/perm/?postID=14536
Member Comments (14)

USA, USA, USA -- We're #62?!?!?

Posted on Nov. 23, 10 | 04:00 PM by David Keating | Topic: Taxes
Number 62?  That's terrible.  No, it's not curling (US Men are #5 and US women are #8), where Team USA does pretty well.

It's in the "ease of paying taxes" competition in a new study published by World Bank, the International Finance Corporation (IFC) and PwC.  The ranking accounts for the difficulty of figuring out the tax, how many times you have to pay it and the total tax rate.

Our #62 ranking was pulled up by the #35 ranking for the number of payments.  What pulled it down was the pathetic #124 ranking for the total tax rate.

Anyway you look at it, a very disappointing performance by Team USA, meaning the Congress and the president.

P.S. -- You've got to admire Brazil, which sets the dubious world record for complex tax rules.  Compliance time for the studied business was a whopping 2,600 hours per year, over double the amount for Bolivia, the country in next to last place at 1,080 hours.

Permalink: http://www.clubforgrowth.org/perm/?postID=14520
Member Comments (5)


Use Arrows to Open and Close Articles
Club for Growth is a national network of thousands of Americans, from all walks of life, who believe that prosperity and opportunity come through economic freedom. We work to promote public policies that promote economic growth primarily through legislative involvement, issue advocacy, research, training and educational activity. Join today!

Username



Password


Remember me | Forgot password?
OR
Join Today